Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 53 of 53

Thread: Galatasaray

  1. #41
    Senior Member karlsruhe hoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,797
    Thanks
    2,249
    Thanked 3,395 Times in 1,379 Posts
    vCash
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul View Post
    As an immigrant albeit economic (Presume your Irish, apologies if not?) should you not be more symptomatic? Economic migration is different in that if a country is willing to employ then they not the people benefit more. Germany getting your tax not Ireland for example?

    Would imagine the 50000 you speak about earn a lot of bucks for uncle sam. Interestingly Ireland would benefit from their return, well so says the likes of David mcWilliams but that's another story.

    There are legals and illegals all over the place. Whatever. Each to his own.

    But it's the non-stop campaigning to be treated differently (as in, much better) than all the other illegals that really, really grates.

    Why can't they just say – yeah – we're illegal, just like the Mexicans, instead of constantly using the bizarre term "undocumented". It really sounds as if it isn't their fault at all.

    I mean – blaming the U.S. because they didn't make their parents' funerals??? That is bizarre and frankly pretty odious.
    Last edited by karlsruhe hoop; 14-01-16 at 17:43.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Dublin 14
    Posts
    609
    Thanks
    365
    Thanked 431 Times in 172 Posts
    vCash
    500
    Van Persie scored two great efforts for Fener the other evening. Still one of the most lethal left foots in Europe at the minute!

  3. #43
    Senior Member Gallaeo15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Knocklyon
    Posts
    620
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 195 Times in 114 Posts
    vCash
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by karlsruhe hoop View Post
    There are legals and illegals all over the place. Whatever. Each to his own.

    But it's the non-stop campaigning to be treated differently (as in, much better) than all the other illegals that really, really grates.

    Why can't they just say – yeah – we're illegal, just like the Mexicans, instead of constantly using the bizarre term "undocumented". It really sounds as if it isn't their fault at all.

    I mean – blaming the U.S. because they didn't make their parents' funerals??? That is bizarre and frankly pretty odious.
    couldnt agree more with this.

    tried for a green card in the lottery a few times in my early 20s to no avail. Then 15 yrs later at election time to have a politician on my doorstep telling me he was going to help the 'undocumented' particularly got on the nerves. When I asked how about instead he gets those that have broken the law sent home and maybe help out those that tried to get there legally, but obeyed the law and stayed behind, he didn't have much to say.

    probably offered a cut in income tax rate instead !

  4. #44
    Nazi SRFCnewbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    781
    Thanks
    1,763
    Thanked 422 Times in 162 Posts
    vCash
    500
    Wow this really went off-topic.

    Some pretty interesting opinions here. The point about East German Nazi hooligans is bang on. Last week there was a Pegida (anti immigration) march in Leipzig, East Germany, around 200 people splintered off and rampaged through the alternative District of Connewitz. They attacked bookshops, kebab stores and the Pub of Roter Stern Leipzig, a antifascist football club. All of them were Hooligans from Lok Leipzig and Chemie Halle.

    As for Ireland being vulnerable (it's an Island?) and letting in 'large amounts' of refugees, these points are baseless scaremongering and demonstrably untrue. Meanwhile in Germany, the vast majority of Refugees, Syrian and otherwise, are settling in pretty well considering the horrible conditions they are still facing. The Cologne incident was disgusting, and on a personal level, if you asked me 'should someone who sexually assaulted a woman be sent back to Syria to have a bomb fucked on him?' I would say 'Yes, fuck him'. But we shouldn't make policy based on personal, knee-jerk reactions. The full facts are still not known, and it was certainly not carried out exclusively by Refugees who just hopped off a train, as has been presented by many.

    It should also be pointed out that there has not been a single day in months now in Germany, without at least some reported anti-refugee violence, from single attacks to burning of refugee homes, and this is certainly not been confined to 'The Dark East' as some would have you believe. The media has been less interested in this generally though.

    I also find it laughable that those on the right now suddenly want to talk about misogyny, sexism and rape culture when it fits their political narrative.

    Now is the time for cool heads in Germany, the Right needs to be opposed as strongly as ever, but the left also needs to not bury its head in the sand and be afraid to denounce and work against sexism, misogyny and homophobia in all cultures. Difficult, tough times ahead, that's for sure.

    PS I'm still going to Istanbul this week, Fuck DAESH!
    Last edited by SRFCnewbie; 20-01-16 at 15:14.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to SRFCnewbie For This Useful Post:


  6. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    621
    Thanks
    233
    Thanked 590 Times in 234 Posts
    vCash
    20
    Geuine refugees have to be helped and made welcome, women and children in particlar but they should integrate and live according to the laws of the country that saved their ass's, the religious extremists can fuck off back home. The only way to differenciate between the two is for stringent border checks and controls, if we allow an open border system we're looking for trouble and that's not scaremongering, that's simple economics.

  7. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    443
    Thanks
    195
    Thanked 281 Times in 105 Posts
    vCash
    400
    Heres one German womans experience of working with migrants, before this she was very keen.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...refugee-centre

    "For us women they have often only scornful looks - or just intrusive. They whistle loudly, say something to one another in a foreign language, laugh.
    "It's really very unpleasant. It even happened that they have photographed us with their Smartphone.
    "They do it without asking even if one has protested. I once walked up some steep stairs and some of the men walked behind me and they were laughing the whole time and, I guess, talking about me. They shouted something at me.
    "Colleagues have told me similar things have happened to them. But they said that there's nothing you can do.
    "If they whistled at me or said something to me I said nothing to encourage them - to make them feel they can hurt me or influence me.
    "But that has not helped; It is even worse - honestly: especially in the last few weeks, as more and more men from North Africa, from Morocco, Tunisia or Libya are arriving here.
    "They were more aggressive. I could ignore them no longer - and reacted."

  8. #47
    Senior Member karlsruhe hoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,797
    Thanks
    2,249
    Thanked 3,395 Times in 1,379 Posts
    vCash
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by SRFCnewbie View Post
    Wow this really went off-topic.

    Some pretty interesting opinions here. The point about East German Nazi hooligans is bang on. Last week there was a Pegida (anti immigration) march in Leipzig, East Germany, around 200 people splintered off and rampaged through the alternative District of Connewitz. They attacked bookshops, kebab stores and the Pub of Roter Stern Leipzig, a antifascist football club. All of them were Hooligans from Lok Leipzig and Chemie Halle.

    As for Ireland being vulnerable (it's an Island?) and letting in 'large amounts' of refugees, these points are baseless scaremongering and demonstrably untrue. Meanwhile in Germany, the vast majority of Refugees, Syrian and otherwise, are settling in pretty well considering the horrible conditions they are still facing. The Cologne incident was disgusting, and on a personal level, if you asked me 'should someone who sexually assaulted a woman be sent back to Syria to have a bomb fucked on him?' I would say 'Yes, fuck him'. But we shouldn't make policy based on personal, knee-jerk reactions. The full facts are still not known, and it was certainly not carried out exclusively by Refugees who just hopped off a train, as has been presented by many.

    It should also be pointed out that there has not been a single day in months now in Germany, without at least some reported anti-refugee violence, from single attacks to burning of refugee homes, and this is certainly not been confined to 'The Dark East' as some would have you believe. The media has been less interested in this generally though.

    I also find it laughable that those on the right now suddenly want to talk about misogyny, sexism and rape culture when it fits their political narrative.

    Now is the time for cool heads in Germany, the Right needs to be opposed as strongly as ever, but the left also needs to not bury its head in the sand and be afraid to denounce and work against sexism, misogyny and homophobia in all cultures. Difficult, tough times ahead, that's for sure.

    PS I'm still going to Istanbul this week, Fuck DAESH!

    The worst anti-refugee fascism is definitely in ex East Germany. Which is actually nearly hilarious. Because when the wall fell, the whole of East Germany were essentially refugees.

    Refugees from a fucked up state that had treated them like dirt for decades. And they all immediately qualified for dole, pensions, social welfare, the health service – absolutely everything. Without ever having paid a cent in.

    A new solidarity tax was introduced in 1991 to cover the cost of sorting out ex East Germany. Was supposed to be just for a couple of years. And guess what? We’re still paying it.

    So why the fuck it isn’t possible to greet and treat the refugees with a bit more respect throughout ex East Germany is absolutely fucking beyond me.

    Is that the way history works? Because they were pissed on for so many years, they now need to piss on someone else?

    I don’t see any problems around my neck of the woods – Karlsruhe, Mannheim, Heidelberg. The vast, vast majority treat the refugees with complete respect – and are fully aware that the cunts in Cologne and elsewhere are mostly Moroccan and Algerian scum that need to be weeded out and fucked out as fast as possible. The way they treat the country they expect to welcome and support them is fucking despicable.
    Last edited by karlsruhe hoop; 21-01-16 at 00:50.

  9. #48
    Senior Member karlsruhe hoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,797
    Thanks
    2,249
    Thanked 3,395 Times in 1,379 Posts
    vCash
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by sherlock View Post
    Heres one German womans experience of working with migrants, before this she was very keen.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...refugee-centre

    "For us women they have often only scornful looks - or just intrusive. They whistle loudly, say something to one another in a foreign language, laugh.
    "It's really very unpleasant. It even happened that they have photographed us with their Smartphone.
    "They do it without asking even if one has protested. I once walked up some steep stairs and some of the men walked behind me and they were laughing the whole time and, I guess, talking about me. They shouted something at me.
    "Colleagues have told me similar things have happened to them. But they said that there's nothing you can do.
    "If they whistled at me or said something to me I said nothing to encourage them - to make them feel they can hurt me or influence me.
    "But that has not helped; It is even worse - honestly: especially in the last few weeks, as more and more men from North Africa, from Morocco, Tunisia or Libya are arriving here.
    "They were more aggressive. I could ignore them no longer - and reacted."

    Note that she doesn't mention SYRIA. I've no idea how so many single men from Morocco, Tunisia and Libya managed to get in. Mad. But they need to be fucked out pronto. They are treating the whole thing like a game. Because even German prison is probably better than where they came from. They just don't give a fuck.

  10. #49
    Senior Member Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    1,044
    Thanked 672 Times in 244 Posts
    vCash
    463
    £1,000 charge per non-EU skilled migrant worker proposed
    By PRESS ASSOCIATION
    PUBLISHED: 15:43 GMT, 19 January 2016 | UPDATED: 15:43 GMT, 19 January 2016

    Companies would be forced to pay an annual charge of £1,000 for every skilled worker they employ from outside Europe under proposals from the Government's official migration advisers.
    Ministers were urged to raise the minimum salary threshold from £20,800 a year to £30,000 for the main route used by non-EU migrants coming to Britain for work.
    In another significant finding, a major report by the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) suggested that any undercutting of domestic employees by staff arriving under the Tier 2 skilled worker scheme is "largely confined" to the public sector.

    The study claimed that the money raised could to towards skills training for British workers
    It also called for rules on transfers within companies to be tightened amid indications the route was being used to bring over migrants to service third-party contracts rather than highly specialised senior personnel.
    The MAC was asked to investigate possible changes to Tier 2 visa requirements for skilled employees from outside the European Economic Area last year to address concerns about the rising number of migrants in the route and the reliance on them to fill shortages in the labour market.
    When applicants' family members and all avenues of the system are included, experts say the route accounts for an in-flow of 151,000 people to Britain a year.
    Indications suggest that raising salary thresholds would mean 27,600 fewer individuals would come to the country, or around 18% of the total, and this would be higher if the levy proposal is accepted, the MAC estimated, although it said it was impossible to be definitive because the impact will depend on how firms respond.
    The committee said it "strongly" supports the introduction of an Immigration Skills Charge, arguing an upfront annual levy of £1,000 per Tier 2 migrant could provide £250 million for skills funding each year.
    Professor Sir David Metcalf, chairman of the MAC, said: "Raising the cost of employing skilled migrants via higher pay thresholds, and the introduction of an Immigration Skills Charge, should lead to greater investment in UK employees and reduce the use of migrant labour."
    Under Tier 2, skilled workers must currently have a job with an annual salary of at least £20,800. The MAC said that raising this to £30,000 would better represent the current degree-level skill requirement for Tier 2.
    The report also examined how salaries paid to non-EU skilled staff compare with the UK workforce and found that generally Tier 2 migrants were paid more, supporting the view that those in the route bring "scarce skills".
    However, it said some occupations in which Tier 2 migrants are paid substantially less than native workers in similar roles and these were "predominantly" in public sector occupations.
    It estimated that on average, Tier 2 doctors and nurses are paid £6,000 less a year than their native peers, while secondary school teachers earn £2,000 less annually.
    The report said: "If any undercutting is taking place under Tier 2, it appears to be largely confined to the public sector."
    It also called for an overhaul of the intra-company transfer route which allows multinational companies to move key personnel from overseas branches to the UK for temporary periods.
    The conventional use of the route, where small numbers of highly skilled specialist staff are brought to Britain, delivers "significant benefits" but it was also increasingly being used for third-party contracts, particularly in the IT sector, the report found. Indian IT workers were said to comprise more than 90% of such migrants.
    The MAC said third-party contracting should become a separate route, with the salary threshold raised from £24,800 to £41,500 to act as an "effective proxy" for senior managers and specialists.
    It also recommended extending the qualifying period to be eligible for intra-company transfers from 12 months to 2 years.
    The Institute of Directors urged the government to reject the proposals, saying they will "hurt thousands of individual firms".
    Director General Simon Walker added: "T his will send a message around the world that the UK is no longer open to international talent."
    A Home Office spokesman said: "We are grateful to the Migration Advisory Committee for its report. We are considering its findings and will respond in due course."


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/...#ixzz3xrJ5frVY
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
    RAWK - "Might as well write off next season already , when will this nightmare ever end"

  11. #50
    Senior Member Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    1,044
    Thanked 672 Times in 244 Posts
    vCash
    463
    China is changing so fast – doesn’t every piece written about China begin that way these days? Unfortunately, this also applies to employment regulations for foreign workers in China. When I arrived in Beijing more than a decade ago, it seemed easier to get a job and secure the correct paperwork. However, maybe this is rose-tinted thinking.

    Most executives working in China were sent by their company’s head office. Very few management level people found jobs here by other means. Every day we receive many applications from either professionals overseas wanting to come to China, or from those based here whose contracts are finishing and who want to extend their stay. However, we see few openings from our clients for foreign executives.

    If you have been sent by a multinational to work in a local office, there should be little or no difficulty getting the correct paperwork from the Chinese authorities.

    What about the majority who don’t fall into that senior level category? There are several groups of people that either can’t get (or potentially don’t want) a work visa. People without two years of working experience or a bachelor’s degree, for example, will find it very difficult to gain approval from the Chinese authorities.

    I recently met a scientist with a doctorate degree, working for a world-leading research organisation. When her company applied for a work visa for her, she was rejected. The local bureau felt that China has plenty of scientists and therefore didn’t need any from overseas.

    In the scientist’s case, the rejection may have been political as her organisation was conducting some sensitive research, but, on the other hand, the organisation hadn’t proved that they couldn’t find a local person who could do that job.

    So what choices do you have if you cannot secure a work visa? This is where China’s famous, or infamous, grey area comes into view. Everyone working in China knows someone who is working without a work permit.

    I was enjoying a cold beer at the weekend when an expat came into the pub, loudly complaining that his application to have his five-year tourist visa extended had been turned down.

    Wait a second. A five-year tourist visa? You’ve been a tourist for five years? No work? No cash? And now you want to extend that?

    Another group of long-termers are those holding business visas. This truly is a grey area. If you are running a company here doing import/export, and you are based here the majority of the year, you really should have a work permit, but in reality, many do not.

    A different problem exists for those working for companies who are not willing to apply and pay for the correct paperwork on your behalf.

    Last year, I interviewed a young expat for a junior consultant position with my company. During the interview it became clear that she didn’t have enough work experience for me to get a work visa for her. Her current company had told her that she was fine with a business visa, and it was better for her because she would pay less tax. This is terrible advice if you plan on staying here for any length of time.

    First, we have a moral obligation to contribute to the country we are living in. Also, these loopholes are closing quickly. Who really wants to live looking over their shoulder? You are risking a heavy fine and possible deportation.

    So, if your company will not provide the paperwork, what are your options? My advice is simply to think about whether you really want to work for that kind of company.

    In my opinion the Chinese government will continue to tighten the regulations for foreigners wanting to work here. This is a natural process for a rapidly developing country. It’s a simple fact that the local workforce is now qualified to do many of the jobs that companies used to ask expats to do.

    However, China is still, without doubt, the land of opportunity. Like most things in life, if you want something badly enough, you’ll find a way to get it. Consider the points below.

    If you have a work visa then do everything you can to hang on to it. It’s much easier to transfer it to a new company than to apply for a new visa.
    If you currently have a student, spouse or tourist visa, it is becoming more and more difficult to transfer to a work visa. It is likely you will have to return to your own country as part of this process. Clearly this can be very costly, so check if your potential employer is willing to pay for this before you begin.
    It is easier to get a visa for some jobs than others. Not all of these jobs have high entry qualifications. English teaching, for example, remains a relatively simple way to enter the workforce in China.
    If you are working here without the correct visa, then begin to think about getting your papers in order. The current grey areas will not last forever.
    RAWK - "Might as well write off next season already , when will this nightmare ever end"

  12. #51
    Senior Member Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    1,044
    Thanked 672 Times in 244 Posts
    vCash
    463
    LONDON — It is being called the “meatball war.”

    To be precise, pork meatballs and other pork dishes such as roasts have become the latest weapons in the culture wars playing out in Europe over immigration after a Danish town voted this week to require public day care centers and kindergartens to include the meat on their lunch menus.

    Denmark, known as a generous welfare state and for its freewheeling, marijuana-friendly Christiania neighborhood of Copenhagen, has been cracking down on immigration in recent months, as countries across the Continent grapple with an influx that is pushing many to re-evaluate their approach to asylum seekers.

    Supporters of the proposal, which was passed late Monday by the council of Randers, a former industrial town of about 60,000 in central Denmark, said that serving traditional Danish food such as pork was essential to help preserve national identity.

    Critics of the requirement, including members of the Muslim population and migration advocates, said it effectively created a problem that did not exist for the purpose of stigmatizing Muslims. There has never been an attempt to ban pork from any public lunch menu in Randers, they said, describing the latest initiative as a polarizing and barely veiled attempt to target Muslims.

    “Danish food culture” must be a “central part of the offering — including serving pork on an equal footing with other foods,” the proposal says, adding that its intention was not to force anyone to eat something that “goes against one’s belief or religion.” Pork is forbidden under religious dietary laws for both Muslims and Jews.

    But Martin Henriksen, a spokesman for the Danish People’s Party, a far-right anti-immigrant party that backed the measure, framed the move on his Facebook page as necessary to uphold Danish culture in the face of potential threats from Islam.

    “It is unacceptable to ban Danish food culture, including dishes with pork, in Danish child care institutions. What will be next?!” he wrote. “The Danish People’s Party is working nationally and locally for Danish culture, including Danish food culture, and that means we are also fighting against Islamic rules and misguided considerations dictating what Danish children should eat.”

    The rule on pork comes as Denmark is poised to pass a law that would force refugees to hand over their valuables, including jewelry, to help pay for lodging them, a move that has angered human rights groups and drawn criticism from the United Nations.

    Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen has also warned that the 1951 United Nations treaty governing the rights of refugees might need to be revised. And this month, after Sweden introduced identity checks for travelers arriving from Denmark, the Danes did the same along their border with Germany.

    In Denmark, a small Scandinavian country where farming has long been part of the national identity and pork is a popular staple, some commentators said it was not surprising that the ubiquitous pig had become a point of contention. In 2014, crispy pork with parsley sauce was named Denmark’s national dish. The country is also among the world’s largest pig meat exporters, according to the Danish Agriculture and Food Council.

    Ayse Dudu Tepe, an archaeologist and radio host who was born in Denmark to Turkish parents, noted, with more than a hint of wryness, that she could understand those agitating on behalf of pigs.

    “In a country with more pigs than humans,” she wrote on her Facebook page, “it makes perfect sense to have a political party talking on behalf of the pigs.”

    Charlotte Molbaek, a member of the Socialist People’s Party on the Randers Town Council, said the proposal was politically motivated. The Danish People’s Party has become a potent political force, in part by railing against immigration and fashioning itself as the protector of traditional Danish values.

    “What do children need? Do they need pork? Actually not. But the Danish People’s Party does,” she was quoted as saying by Politiken, a daily newspaper, during a debate on the measure. “Children need grown-ups.”

    Denmark is not alone in viewing culture, including food, as a bulwark to protect national identity. In food-obsessed France, where calls to uphold the country’s vaunted secular liberal values have become all the more urgent after two separate terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists, pork has become a sometimes emotive issue in debates over integration.

    Several towns run by rightist mayors have tried to remove nonpork options from school cafeterias in a professed effort to preserve French identity, even as members of the Muslim and Jewish populations have protested that such policies risk alienating minorities. In Chalon-sur-Saône, in the French region of Burgundy, elementary school students who do not eat pork have to content themselves with vegetables after the City Council voted in September to stop offering substitutions like fish on their menus on days when pork is served.

    Schools in Europe have increasingly come under scrutiny for their essential role in fostering integration, and, on Wednesday, it emerged in Britain that a 10-year-old Muslim boy had been questioned by the police in December after his spelling skills failed him and he mistakenly wrote that he lives in a “terrorist house” during an English lesson.

    The boy, from Lancashire, in northwest England, had meant to write “terraced house,” the BBC reported.

    But in Denmark, it is food at schools that has spurred the latest debate. Fatma Cetinkaya, a member of the Social Democrats on the Randers Town Council, called the new measure “incomprehensible.”

    “Randers has always been at the forefront when it comes to integration,” she was quoted as saying by Politiken. “We don’t have problems with crime and a lot of other things, so it’s incomprehensible that pork has been made into a problem. It’s such a shame.”

    But she was philosophical. “As a Muslim, you get thick-skinned,” she said.
    Last edited by Paul; 21-01-16 at 07:08.
    RAWK - "Might as well write off next season already , when will this nightmare ever end"

  13. #52
    Senior Member Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    1,044
    Thanked 672 Times in 244 Posts
    vCash
    463
    Denmark Moves to Make Refugees Hand Over Valuables
    By DAN BILEFSKYJAN. 13, 2016

    LONDON — Denmark is poised to pass a law requiring newly arrived refugees to hand over valuables, including gold or jewelry, to help pay for the costs of lodging them. Under the proposal, asylum seekers who enter the country with more than 10,000 kroner, or about $1,450, in assets would have to help finance their stay.

    The proposal, which has outraged humanitarian activists and raised the ire of United Nations officials, is the latest in a series of migrant-deterring steps taken recently by Denmark, which once prided itself on its openness to foreigners. The government took out newspaper ads in Lebanon informing would-be asylum seekers that welfare benefits for refugees had been cut in half. Its prime minister warned that the 1951 United Nations treaty governing the rights of refugees might have to be revised. And last week, it imposed temporary controls along its border with Germany.

    Critics say the latest measure evokes Europe’s darkest hours, when the Nazis seized valuables from Jews during the Holocaust. The government has amended the bill to exempt from confiscation “objects with sentimental value,” like wedding and engagement rings and family portraits. A vote is scheduled for Jan. 26, and approval with wide cross-party support is expected.

    Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen defended the bill this week. “This is probably the most misunderstood proposal in the history of Denmark,” he was quoted as saying by Politiken, a Danish daily newspaper. “Looking at the debate, you almost get the impression that we are going to turn people upside down to see if we can shake the last coin out of their pockets. That is completely distorted and wrong.”

    Mr. Rasmussen said the bill would merely make the same requirement of refugees that Danish law already does for the country’s citizens — that they must use their own resources before they can qualify for welfare benefits.

    Other countries in Europe, even the most hospitable, have also been tightening their borders against the flow of thousands of asylum seekers, citing economic and security concerns. Fears are growing that terrorists are entering Europe masquerading as refugees. Finland has called on asylum seekers to work without pay, and Sweden introduced identity checks last week for travelers arriving from Denmark, prompting Denmark to do the same along its border with Germany.

    In Denmark, as in countries like France and Sweden, a far-right populist party, the Danish People’s Party, has been attracting voters by railing against immigration. Mr. Rasmussen’s governing center-right party, which does not have a majority in Parliament, often needs the Danish People’s Party’s support to pass legislation.

    Analysts said the recent moves by Denmark reflected a concerted effort to make the country less attractive for refugees. Among the new bill’s provisions is a three-year waiting period before asylum seekers can apply to bring their families to Denmark, which human rights activists have criticized as unusually cruel.

    The United Nations refugee agency has called the proposed legislation an affront to refugees’ dignity and said it would send a worrying signal to other countries. In a statement this month, before the bill was amended, the commission said it “could fuel fear, xenophobia and similar restrictions that would reduce — rather than expand — the asylum space globally and put refugees in need at life-threatening risks.”

    Jens Rohde, a Danish member of the European Parliament, said in an interview on Wednesday that the bill represented an image of Denmark that he did not recognize. Mr. Rohde left Mr. Rasmussen’s center-right party, Venstre, in December in protest over the bill, saying that the party had lost its way and that it was in thrall to the far right.

    “Even with the latest changes to the bill, the legislation still paints a bad image of Denmark in the international community, and I don’t recognize myself or the Danish people in this bill,” Mr. Rohde said. “The bill is less horrible than before, but still undignified.”

    The bill has had particular resonance in Denmark because the country has historically been known for its tolerance and generosity. During World War II, when Denmark was occupied by Nazi Germany, Danish citizens managed to save most of the country’s 7,800 Jews by smuggling them to neighboring Sweden before they could be rounded up. Denmark also took in a large number of refugees during the Balkan wars of the 1990s.

    Last year, Denmark received 21,000 asylum seekers, according to the Danish Refugee Council. Sweden, in contrast, received about 163,000 asylum seekers, and Germany was expected to have received more than a million, the council said.

    Jakob Nielsen, the editor of Politiken’s online edition, said it was paradoxical that Denmark was trying to make the country less attractive for immigrants. “Danes are known for being some of the happiest people on earth, with one of the most generous welfare states, and now the government is trying to worsen our image to give the message: Refugees, don’t come here.”
    Last edited by Paul; 21-01-16 at 07:13.
    RAWK - "Might as well write off next season already , when will this nightmare ever end"

  14. #53
    Senior Member Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    729
    Thanks
    1,044
    Thanked 672 Times in 244 Posts
    vCash
    463
    Really scary stuff and very little mention on mainstream news

    https://www.rt.com/news/330180-polic...ampaign=chrome

    A police patrol of 10 officers was surrounded by a mob of violent refugees and had to retreat from a refugee center in Sweden where they had arrived to relocate a 10-year-old boy after reports of his repeated rape.

    One of the officers described what had happened in a police report obtained by the Vestmanlands Läns Tidning newspaper.

    “Even more people appeared behind us. I was mentally prepared to fight for my life. We were 10 police officers in a narrow corridor. And I hear someone yell that there is an emergency exit,” the officer said.

    The incident took place in the Signalisten asylum in Västerås last Wednesday. But police didn’t provide any information to the press until Monday this week.


    The authorities decided to relocate some of the refugees from the Signalisten asylum after reports on Saturday that the boy was being subjected to repeated rape there. However, the asylum staff failed to achieve the transfer by themselves as they were met by hostile attitude from the refugees, so they called the police.

    With Sweden’s prime minister stating on Monday that more staff is needed among the police dealing with an influx of asylum seekers, it’s clear that the authorities and the police are struggling to keep things under control.

    “Many of the problems we are now facing help to prove the point that Swedish police have long been underfunded and understaffed,” Police Union Director Lena Nitz, told TT news agency.

    Just this Monday a young woman, a refugee center worker in Mölndal, was stabbed to death when a quarrel broke out at the center for underage unaccompanied refugees. Alexandra Mezher, 22, was taken to hospital with severe injuries and later died. She was stabbed by a 15-year-old boy who was later arrested on suspicion of murder. Mezher’s thesis was titled ‘The Road to Non-Criminal - A Lifestyle Change’. She believed that creating a trustful relationship with people was key for a social worker. The center where she worked housed 10 youths aged between 14 and 17.



    Police have warned citizens that train stations are overrun by gangs of young refugee boys who assault and grope women, and pickpocket and harass passengers.

    A number of girls in Stockholm have reported sexual assault in public swimming pools, again involving asylum seekers.
    RAWK - "Might as well write off next season already , when will this nightmare ever end"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •